SO WHERE DID ALL MY THINKING BEGIN?

What was the original motivation to write this book?

As we all know that life has a beginning. It was as a young child that I was totally perplexed with the bombardment of misinformation. The message promulgated never ceased to explain that what was to be understood is a directive of obedience for all people of God's creation. It was not for us to question the book of literary instruction but to be a believer of an unbreakable path to righteousness.

Death was a tormented word that meant that if we as children did not abide with what was written in the big black book we would all land up in a place called hell. The added complexities to youth were compounded with dogmatic instruction which would eventually cause confusion among all contemporaries within the understanding of the so-called truth.

 

Obviously, I was waylaid by dogmatic control for many years but eventually the introspective turmoil of the thinking process, was able to yield a structured and individualistic methodology to unhindered thought.

I systematically compared what had been created by our unseen GOD and made a comparable assumption in terms of the level of competence of the thinking Universal mind and that of humankind.

Firstly, what was important was to be able to identify who and what is the Universal Mind. Secondly, the methodology of an evolutionary process was adopted within the structuring of the Universal mind. Understandably, projects like planetary development that set the stage for developmental practices, would inevitably lead to the creation of the Universe.

I followed practical applications that are developed on our planet and realised that this format of learning and development is identical to the evolutionary practices of our Universal Mind. A logical sequence of developmental practices originated within the thought process that necessitated a structured developmental code of “Thirty two Universal Laws” that are explained in the book at hand.

To explain the Universal laws we must understand the consequential developmental practices of a thinking mind, that uses a logical application to a thought process. It starts with an objective need and requirement that the thinking process will eventually combine all structures of thought to a resolute and practical solution, This format of thought is found in both the Universal Mind and developing minds in a planetary environment.

The book “The Creation of the Celestial Universe” leads us to the understanding of the reasons why it was imperative for the thinking Universal Mind, to move from a thought based existence, to the developmental and manifestation of progressive and a practical application to formulated thinking.

The correlation has to be drawn between that of purpose as set out by the universal Mind that which is expected and interpreted by planetary developmental methodologies.

The expressed view of a dominating society is evident and is regarded as repugnant to the required purpose and the originality of creation. The book defines the purpose of creation in all spheres and to be an extension and continuation in a projected application of thought, in a physical application based on planetary development.

We are led to believe that not all thought provoked development that was instigated by the Universal Mind, is a perfectly planned scenario as there were to be many challenges within the created structures of thought.

The created life soon enough had to adapt to various types of environmental adaptations on a planetary setting. If you refer to our environment and the changing ecology of life in our own present time, you can imagine life at a level of experimentation and the many evolutionary methodologies that were contrasting and adding confusion to the thought process of the Universal Mind. 

In my next Blog, I intend to pursue an overview of the “Thirty Two Universal Laws” that are the fundamental authority to the existence of the Universal mind and those very laws that perpetuate the planetary laws of succession.

The Creation of the Celestial Universe.

 

          UNDERSTANDING CREATION

                    VISIT THE DEPTHS OF THE CREATIVE UNIVERSAL MIND.

I have been contemplating the myths that surround the Universal Creation for many years. The relentless jargon of understanding that the supreme creator whose presence we have named GOD, has been the sole contributor to creating the planetary system within a seven day period. I have become quite interrogative in searching for the ultimate truth to creation.

Candidly, my philosophy to creation debunks the mythical biblical understanding to universal creation and follows a logical and simplistic methodology of physics. We will get to understand that firstly, mass was created by default and a series of systematic events took place that ultimately led to the creation of a Universal Mind.

I have undertaken the journey of mental research, based on the mere fact that to me it is abundantly clear that the Universe and our particular planet was created from a commitment of thought and implementation and manifestation of a thinking mind. I have followed the systematic and disciplined methodologies, of the human being and came to the conclusion that we have followed a similar inculcated developmental method, as adopted by the Supreme Being.

I need to impart to the reader that we cannot research our understanding of creation if we do not have an open mind to Meta physics. We combine Universal science and the separate science of planetary development. My understanding of Meta physics is the contemplation and understanding of the thought process of pre planetary development. Planetary science as we know it, is the manifestation of Universal thought being implemented by life on a universal planet.

I endeavour to explain to the reader in simplistic terms the result of the first implosion of mass and the resulting effect and leading to the creation of the Universal Mind. This phenomenon I have named the “Miatrass Effect”.

I then take the reader through an exciting evolutionary process of the Universals Minds development of thirty-two universal laws that define the capabilities of the Supreme thinking Mind. We embark on a process of understanding the evolutionary process itself and end with the decision by the evolutionised Mind to that of creating the planetary system and at a later stage the creation of life.

We, as created life, now have the privilege of being able to reason and use pure logic of thought or a thinking process that was required to be able to create and actualise that of the planetary universe as we know it today.

I investigate the time factor of planetary development that is based on the individual rotation and development of time on every planet. I compare the evaluation to the Universal Mind’s time factor which we deem as a zero factor but in fact by creation of a Celestial Universe the Universal Mind has developed its own laws of time.

The reader will be asked the question, at what point did the Universal mind reach a point of optimisation as far as the thinking process was concerned and at what point was the departure of the thought process and the conception of actualising thought into manifestation and embarking on the development of the Universal Solar system.

To me, as a person who has spent the best part of my life giving thought to creation, the one phenomenon that has stood out candidly, is the fact of evolutionary science. Neither the universal Mind nor that of the planetary developmental practices escapes the continuous evolutionary process.  Implementation of thought, and the methodology of development is being continuously tried and tested to that what will be regarded as near perfection and adding to the physical application to planetary life.      

With reference to the universal laws, I embark on the creation of life that is revealed in the ultimate developmental skill as undertaken by the Universal Mind. I look at the pure methodology of life’s creation, in comparing our scientists of the Universal past, and the present day scientists who make use of a back engineering methodology. Science will still reach the point of interconnectivity between developmental Universal science and that of planetary knowledge to life.

What to me was most important is the fact that if the universal mind created life, there should be a form of collaboration and the ability to be able to initiate and receive feedback from that what is life. It is quite evident that one form of life would live off that of another. We find that the low spectrum of life is gifted with as we would understand, a life force of intuitiveness. This form of life is used as a form of nutritional value of life on the planet.

The evolutionary process yielded what we would classify as the ultimate mammal called a human being. This being has been gifted with the ability to think within the planetary space of life and is guided by making use of the conscious mind that interfaces with planetary dialogue. Within the thinking mind of the human being we find the subconscious mind that acts as a benefactor to the Universal Mind and surreptitiously adds value to life. The subconscious mind makes use of the methodology of interaction with the higher self, so that the so called God given talents can form a basis for the individual developing being to extrapolate their purpose on the planet. The subconscious mind acts as a communication platform to be able to transmit information to the higher being and as well as to life on the planetary space to speed up developmental practices and objectives.

I knowingly commit a controversial subject to paper, subjecting to the proverbial provocation from those people who have completely different beliefs. We as humans need to remember that as from the beginning of time we all are entitled to our different beliefs. A “belief” is a subjugated matter of fact that is attributed to a human and a planetary phenomenon and advocating the use of systematic methods of dogmatic instruction. I do not follow any form of a belief system. To me it is irrational and not logical. I am seeking a truth to creation and a logical sequence of events to the way of life.

In conclusion:

The quandary to the thinking mind is will we, as a worldly populace, be able to advocate a change and condemn a dogmatic thought practice. Can we as evolutionised humans return to a free-thinking medium and still be able to conceptualise and advocate a permanent developmental structure of progressive thinking with universal development as a priority-based factor?